Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android |
| 2023-11-14 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.48 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| -- | Metal and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | TFT |
| 516 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.76 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.88 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A32 is much better than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, getting a score of 84.7 against 71.5. The Galaxy A32 works with Android operating system, while vivo iQOO 12 Pro has Android 14 operating system. The Galaxy A32 design has the same weight than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, but it is a bit thicker.
Samsung Galaxy A32 features an extremely better processing unit than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, although it has 12 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Vivo iQOO 12 Pro has a much more vibrant screen than Galaxy A32, because it has a much better resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels, a little bigger display and a way higher pixels density.
The vivo iQOO 12 Pro shoots much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A32, because it has a larger camera aperture, a more mega-pixels camera and a way better video quality. The vivo iQOO 12 Pro features just a bit bigger storage to install games and applications than Galaxy A32, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory.
The vivo iQOO 12 Pro features just a little bit longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy A32, because it has a 5100mAh battery capacity instead of 5000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.