Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2023-11-14 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.48 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 516 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.76 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.88 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has a general score of 91.8, which is much better than vivo iQOO 12 Pro's 71.5 global score. Both of these phones come with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has 11 version and vivo iQOO 12 Pro has Android 14. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G's body is a bit thinner and a little bit lighter than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, even though it was released many years before.
Vivo iQOO 12 Pro has a way better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, because it has more pixels per screen inch, a higher 1440 x 3200 resolution and a quite larger display. The Galaxy A71 5G features a much more powerful CPU than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, although it has 10 GB less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Galaxy A71 5G features a quite bigger storage for applications and games than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. Vivo iQOO 12 Pro counts with just a little bit longer battery performance than Galaxy A71 5G, because it has a 13 percent greater battery size.
The vivo iQOO 12 Pro features just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has a camera in the back with much less mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a lot better video quality, a bigger aperture and a way larger back-facing camera sensor shooting much better quality photographs and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.