Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2023-11-14 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.48 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | Black and Gold |
| -- | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.76 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.88 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has a global score of 81, which is better than the vivo iQOO 12 Pro's general score of 71.5. Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro is an extremely older phone than the vivo iQOO 12 Pro, but it is just a little bit lighter and incredibly thinner anyway. These phones work with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has newer 6.0 Marshmallow version and vivo iQOO 12 Pro has Android 14 version, offering a lot of extra features.
Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro counts with a way better performance than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cores. The vivo iQOO 12 Pro counts with a way better looking display than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a little larger screen, a much better 1440 x 3200px resolution and more pixels per inch of screen.
Vivo iQOO 12 Pro shoots a lot better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a larger camera aperture, a lot higher resolution camera and a much higher video definition. The vivo iQOO 12 Pro features much more storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
Vivo iQOO 12 Pro features improved battery life than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a 5100mAh battery size instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.