Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 88 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Asus |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-03 | 2019-09-04 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.73 x 3.06 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 8.47 ounces |
| Black and White | Black Glare |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus SM8150-AC chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Asus ROG Phone II has a score of 88, which is better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro's 77.8 overall score. Even being the best device we are comparing here, we must note that it's also a noticeably older, a little bit heavier and thicker device. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a lot better looking display than Asus ROG Phone II, because it has a lot brighter display, a bigger screen, a way better 2200 x 2480 resolution and a little greater pixels count per inch in the screen.
The Asus ROG Phone II has a very superior CPU than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro takes a bit better pictures and videos than Asus ROG Phone II, because it has a camera in the back with more MP, a lot better video resolution, a bigger aperture to capture better captures and video in poorly lited situations and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro and Asus ROG Phone II count with incredibly similar storage to store more games and applications, both have the same internal memory capacity. Asus ROG Phone II counts with just a little bit longer battery life than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity instead of 5700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.