Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | LG |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-03 | 2016-09-29 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black and White | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 414 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.3 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has an overall score of 77.8, which is a bit better than the LG V20's 77 score. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro body is extremely newer and a lot thinner, but a lot heavier than the LG V20. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has an incredibly better looking screen than LG V20, because although it has a quite worse display pixel density, it also counts with a way larger screen and a higher resolution of 2200 x 2480 pixels.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than LG V20, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 448 GB more internal memory. LG V20 features a very superior performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has less RAM memory and an inferior number of cores.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much better battery life than LG V20, because it has a 78% more battery capacity. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro takes way better pictures and videos than LG V20, because it has a way better 7680x4320 video definition, a much larger sensor which gives a way better image and video quality, a larger diafragm aperture and a back camera with much more mega-pixels.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it is way more expensive than LG V20, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the LG V20. If you are trying to save some money, you can buy LG V20, letting go a few features and specs, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.