Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 79.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Sony |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-24 | 2018-04-05 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.02 x 2.83 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Black, Green, Pink and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| -- | 700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 3180mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xperia XZ2 has a global score of 79.1, which is a little bit better than vivo X50 Pro's 75.4 score. The Xperia XZ2 body is notably older, a little heavier and notably thicker than the vivo X50 Pro. Xperia XZ2 counts with a bit more vivid screen than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2160 resolution and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little better display density.
The Xperia XZ2 has just a little better performance than vivo X50 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The vivo X50 Pro shoots a little bit better videos and photos than Xperia XZ2, because although it has a tinier back camera sensor shooting lower quality images and lower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same video quality, the vivo X50 Pro also counts with a lot more MP camera and a bigger aperture to capture better low light captures and videos.
The vivo X50 Pro features a greater memory capacity to install games and applications than Xperia XZ2, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal memory. Vivo X50 Pro features superior battery performance than Xperia XZ2, because it has a 4315mAh battery capacity against 3180mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.