Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Apple |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-09-10 | 2017-09-22 |
| 6.30 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 849.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.72 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 40.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 8 is better than the vivo X70, with an 85 score against 73.8. IPhone 8's body is just a little thinner and lighter than vivo X70, although it was released many years before. IPhone 8 features a bit faster processing unit than vivo X70, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and an inferior number of cores and also slower, it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit.
The iPhone 8 features a bit more vivid screen than vivo X70, although it has a just a bit lower quantity of pixels per screen inch, a lot smaller screen and a way lower resolution of 750 x 1334px. The vivo X70 captures much clearer pictures and videos than iPhone 8, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not good for low-light photography and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same 60 fps video frame rate, the vivo X70 also counts with a bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a much more mega pixels back-facing camera.
The iPhone 8 counts with much more storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than vivo X70, because it has more internal memory capacity. The vivo X70 has a much better battery performance than iPhone 8, because it has a 4400mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.