Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-09-10 | 2018-10-20 |
| 6.30 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.29 x 3.02 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | 16 777 216 |
| Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 40.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.33 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 3300mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.24 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) is much better than vivo X70, having a score of 84.2 against 73.8. The Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) is a a little lighter cellphone than the vivo X70, but both have the same thickness. Vivo X70 features a little faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X70 also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
The Galaxy A7 (2018) and vivo X70 feature similar displays, because although the Galaxy A7 (2018) has a little smaller display and a quite lower 1080 x 2220 resolution, it also counts with a just a little greater screen density. The vivo X70 counts with a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), because although it has a smaller back-facing camera sensor shooting worse quality videos and images and a tinier aperture, it also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 video resolution and a way better resolution camera in the back.
Galaxy A7 (2018) has a way bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than vivo X70, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Galaxy A7 (2018) also has a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Vivo X70 counts with superior battery duration than Galaxy A7 (2018), because it has a 33 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.