Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android |
| 2021-09-10 | 2019-09-04 |
| 6.30 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Black and White |
| Glass | Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 40.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.24 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A90 5G has a score of 90.5, which is much better than vivo X70's 73.8 overall score. Even being the best cellphone in this comparison review, Galaxy A90 5G's body is much older, somewhat heavier and just a little thicker than the vivo X70. The Galaxy A90 5G counts with Android OS, while vivo X70 counts with Android 11 OS.
Vivo X70 features a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy A90 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the vivo X70 also has more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G and vivo X70 count with very similar screens, because although the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has a just a little inferior count of pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a little larger display and a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
The Galaxy A90 5G shoots just a bit better pictures and videos than vivo X70, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rate and a smaller camera aperture which is not good for taking photographs in low light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Galaxy A90 5G also counts with a way larger sensor which offers a way better photo and video quality and a more megapixels back-facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G features a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than vivo X70, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G also has a SD extension slot that admits up to 512 GB. Galaxy A90 5G counts with a bit better battery performance than vivo X70, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.