| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 5.0, 4.4 |
| 2021-09-10 | 2014-09-03 |
| 6.30 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 5.96 x 3.24 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Black and White |
| Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 525 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 40.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 3.70 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.33 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 10.6 | 7.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 18 hours talk time |
| 6.24 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
The Galaxy Note Edge is much better than vivo X70, having a general score of 81.7 against 73.8. The Galaxy Note Edge is a noticeably older and just a little thicker cellphone than the vivo X70, but Samsung made it just a bit lighter anyway. These phones work with Android operating system, but Galaxy Note Edge has an older 5.0 version while vivo X70 has Android 11 version.
Vivo X70 has just a little better processing power than Galaxy Note Edge, because although it has doesn't have a graphics co-processor, it also counts with a higher number of faster cores and 5 GB more RAM. Samsung Galaxy Note Edge features a better looking display than vivo X70, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 2560 x 1440px resolution and a higher pixel density.
Vivo X70 captures much better photographs and videos than Galaxy Note Edge, because although it has a tinier camera sensor taking less light and duller colors, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the vivo X70 also counts with a larger aperture to take better low-light captures, a way more megapixels back-facing camera and higher 60 frames per second video frame rate.
The vivo X70 has a much better storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy Note Edge, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. Vivo X70 has a superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note Edge, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.