Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Sony |
| Android 11 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-09-10 | 2018-10-17 |
| 6.30 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.22 x 2.87 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | 16 777 216 |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 900.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 40.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 3330mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Sony Xperia XZ3 is a little bit better than the vivo X70, having a score of 79.6 against 73.8. Despite being the best phone we compare here, we must tell that it's also older, just a little bit heavier and a lot thicker. Both phones in this comparison review come with Android OS (Operating System), but Sony Xperia XZ3 has a more recent 9.0 Pie version while vivo X70 has Android 11, offering a couple nice extra features.
Sony Xperia XZ3 counts with a better looking screen than vivo X70, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better display density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2880. The vivo X70 has a bit faster processor than Sony Xperia XZ3, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X70 also has more RAM.
The vivo X70 has a little bit better camera than Xperia XZ3, because although it has a much smaller back-facing camera sensor taking less light and dull colors, and they both have the same video definition, the vivo X70 also counts with higher video frame rate, a bigger aperture and a back-facing camera with a much higher resolution.
Xperia XZ3 features a greater storage capacity for apps and games than vivo X70, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds up to 512 GB. The vivo X70 counts with better battery performance than Xperia XZ3, because it has a 32 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.