Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Vivo |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-03-29 | 2021-09-30 |
| 6.47 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches | 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches |
| 8.25 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Ceramic Black and Ceramic White | Aurora Down and Cosmic black |
| Ceramic | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 1700 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 16.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (1920 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.43 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 8.2 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra has a global score of 90.7, which is better than the vivo X70 Pro's general score of 78.3. The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra construction is just a little bit thicker and incredibly heavier than vivo X70 Pro. Both devices in this comparison include the same Android 11 OS, so you shouldn't perceive any differences regarding OS features.
Vivo X70 Pro has a little bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X70 Pro also has more RAM. Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra has a lot better looking screen than vivo X70 Pro, because it has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200, a bit bigger display and a higher display pixel density.
The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra has just a bit better camera than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is worse for low light images and videos and a much smaller back-facing camera sensor taking less light and duller colors, and they both have a 50 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera, the Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra also counts with a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution.
Vivo X70 Pro's memory to store more games and applications is very similar to the Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra one, they have the same internal memory. Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra counts with just a little better battery duration than vivo X70 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4450mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.