Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 86.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.2, 4.2.1 | Android 11, 10 |
| 0000-00-00 | 2020-03-05 |
| 5.67 x 2.90 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Black | Black, Blue and Red |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 8974-AB chipset | Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2360 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 4.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Li-Ion Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.04 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy M31 has a general score of 86.5, which is a lot better than Xiaomi Mi-3's 71.6 overall score. Both of these phones have Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy M31 has an older 11 version while Xiaomi Mi-3 has Android 4.4.2. Despite being the best cellphone we are comparing here, Samsung Galaxy M31's design is a bit thicker and noticeably heavier than Xiaomi Mi-3.
Samsung Galaxy M31 has a little better processing power than Xiaomi Mi-3, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processor, it also counts with a higher number of cores (but slower) and a greater amount of RAM memory. The Xiaomi Mi-3 counts with a little more vivid display than Galaxy M31, because although it has a way smaller screen and a little worse 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution, it also counts with a bit better number of pixels in each inch of display.
The Galaxy M31 counts with a very superior storage for applications and games than Xiaomi Mi-3, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Galaxy M31 also has an external memory card slot that supports up to 512 GB. The Galaxy M31 takes much better photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi-3, because it has a larger aperture to capture better low-light photography, a back camera with a much higher 64 mega-pixels resolution and a lot better video quality.
The Galaxy M31 features a very superior battery duration than Xiaomi Mi-3, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3050mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.