Compare phones
Xiaomi Mi-3
64 GB| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Vivo |
| Android 4.4.2, 4.2.1 | Android 14 |
| 0000-00-00 | 2024-04-03 |
| 5.67 x 2.90 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black | Black and White |
| $ 300.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 8 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 8974-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2360 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.04 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro is just a bit better than Xiaomi Mi-3, getting a 77.8 score against 71.6. Both devices in this comparison review work with Android OS (operating system), but the vivo X Fold 3 Pro has the older 14 version while Xiaomi Mi-3 has Android 4.4.2 version. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a way heavier but thinner phone than the Xiaomi Mi-3.
The Xiaomi Mi-3 counts with a way better performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because although it has a lower number of cores (but faster) and 14 GB lesser RAM, it also counts with a graphics processing unit. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much better screen than Xiaomi Mi-3, because although it has a little inferior count of pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a much higher 2200 x 2480 pixels resolution and a way bigger screen.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro captures much clearer photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi-3, because it has a much higher video definition, a lot larger aperture to capture better photos and videos in low-light environments and a back facing camera with much more MP. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much bigger storage for applications and games than Xiaomi Mi-3, because it has 512 GB internal storage capacity.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much better battery performance than Xiaomi Mi-3, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity instead of 3050mAh.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it is way more expensive than Xiaomi Mi-3, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Xiaomi Mi-3. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but if you don't you can save some dollars and buy the Xiaomi Mi-3, giving up a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.