Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-08-24 | 2021-09-30 |
| 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.09 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue | Aurora Down and Cosmic black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 457.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 514 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 16.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note9 has an overall score of 87.1, which is much better than vivo X70 Pro's 78.3 score. Even being the best we compare here, we must highlight that it is also a lot older, just a little bit heavier and somewhat thicker. Vivo X70 Pro features a bit faster CPU than Galaxy Note9, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the vivo X70 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy Note9 counts with a slightly better display than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2960 and a greater pixel number per inch in the display. Samsung Galaxy Note9 has a slightly better storage for games and applications than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
Vivo X70 Pro counts with a much better camera than Galaxy Note9, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same video quality, the vivo X70 Pro also counts with a way bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a lot better resolution camera.
Vivo X70 Pro features just a bit better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because it has an 11% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.